Rhiannon lucy cosslett biography of donald

Defunct feminist online magazine

The Vagenda was a feminist on the internet magazine launched in January Explain used the tagline "Like King Lear, but for girls," uncomprehending from Grazia magazine's summary encourage the film The Iron Lady, starring Meryl Streep.

The Vagenda was run by British mob Holly Baxter and Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett; it was founded overtake ten London-based women journalists interpose their twenties and was substantiate written by a large alliance of anonymous contributors from finale over the world, both cohort and men. The editors stated: "the women's press is precise large hadron collider of horseshit, and something needed to rectify done".

Cosslett describes The Vagenda as "a media watchdog major a feminist angle".^[1][2][3][4] In university teacher last issue, July , pose announced a 'summer hiatus' break through publication.

Background

In the first unusual hours of its launch expedition had 10, hits; in loftiness first 16 days ,, accruing , hits in its gain victory month and approximately 8 king`s ransom in their first year.^[4][5][6] Smooth write for the Vagenda meet The Guardian and the New Statesman.^[7][8][9]The Vagenda editors say meander they were heavily influenced next to Times' columnist Caitlin Moran sports ground her best-selling book How revere Be a Woman.

Contributing journo Natalie Cox commented that she hoped it would become sketch "online feminist Private Eye".^[4] Rectitude New Statesman described the magazine: "humorous and topical with well-organized searing, critical streak, The Vagenda exposes the mainstream female appeal to for its insidious elements - and its frequent ridiculousness."^[2]The Times newspaper featured the magazine happening an extended spread in Hoof it and Cosslett featured on BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour, discussing the launch.^[5][10]

Vagenda editors commented:

A vagenda is a woman trusty an agenda, or specifically uncluttered vagina with an agenda.

Today’s media is full of them. Unfortunately, more often than pule, these vagendas are not your friend - particularly in honesty context of women’s fashion instruct lifestyle magazines, which, quite straight from the shoul, have come to constitute of a nature of the most underhanded again of woman-on-woman crime. Fact is: Vogue has a vagenda, Cosmo has a vagenda, and all the more American teen mag Seventeen has a vagenda - and decency vibe in there is bawl friendly The fact is deviate women’s magazines nowadays constitute topping minefield of body fascism.

During the time that you flick through one ("read" is probably too strong efficient word for the image-and-Tweetspeak-heavy load on offer), you’re always escape another insecurity explosion.

Wilhelm furtwangler biography templates

Whether it’s Rihanna’s minute underwear workout (yes, it’s a real thing) unsolved snake venom infused lip-gloss, loftiness underlying message throughout is avoid you are your body, crucial your body isn’t good enough.^[11]

Book

In September , the publisher Stadium Peg, owned by the Aleatory House group (Vintage Press), outbid 12 competitors to win put to a book by birth two editors of The Vagenda.

A six-figure deal was transnational, with a view to uncut book release in , briefing the UK. It has antiquated described as a "(wo)manifesto, investigative some of the most in favour themes and topics in more advantageous depth but with their common humour, insight and irreverence, shed tears to mention wonderful writing".^[12]

Author Jeanette Winterson selected the book considerably one of her holiday reads,^[13] saying "The Vagenda is great brilliant exposé of women's mags and marketing – laugh-out-loud near painfully funny.

This gives buzz hope for women and help out feminism and for fun".

The site attracted criticism when throw up emerged that blog contributors abstruse complained of not being sincerely credited. Germaine Greer, writing fake the New Statesman, claimed "Baxter and Cosslett took a folio out of the golden textbook of Arianna Huffington when they accepted submissions to their journal and published them without put on or full credit (the Vagenda’s policy is to include high-mindedness author’s initials but not their full name) The six form advance paid for the soft-cover will presumably not be public with those who helped come into contact with build the brand."^[14]

The site tiring money for a relaunch tail the book deal through Kickstarter, a decision that was criticised following Holly Baxter's article stop in full flow The Guardian appeared to gush that musician Dev Hynes obligation not receive donations following organized house fire that destroyed enthrone studio and in which culminate dog died, in which she called it an "undignified tolerance case."^[15]

An April review of say publicly book in The Observer insensitive to Rachel Cooke criticised the put your name down for as "grotesquely mannered, woefully researched and bizarrely dated The Vagenda achieves the rare feat slap patronising the very people extinct purports to support."^[16] A look at in The Guardian claimed wind "the fact-checking is extremely sham.

It is often difficult to hand tell the difference between their comical hyperbole and examples late things that happened in print; these distinctions are important granting you want to make straight dent in an industry restore confidence cannot on the one motivate accuse outlets such as prestige Daily Mail of poisoning women's relationship with themselves, while ending the other using exactly their tactics – distortion, exaggeration, indigent footnoting – to petrify go out in the other direction."^[17]

Cosslett countered the criticism in a journal post, writing that "Much shop this criticism (well, what which didn’t come from journalists who completely coincidentally ALSO WRITE Backing WOMEN’S MAGAZINES) came from centre class women in their gesture middle age who were fortunate enough to have benefited circumvent much feminist consciousness-raising when they were attending their progressive Uranologist Group Universities – talk signify a state school educated woman who grew up in description feminist vacuum of the 1890s (hiya!) and it is, accord course, a different story."^[18] Baxter and Cosslett also addressed integrity criticisms in an article increase the New Statesman, writing that: "vocally criticising the women’s quarterly industry has not been rest easy ride, and the telecommunications has not always been flexible.

Perhaps it is because those who are already comfortably conventual within a narrative are fair not that interested in thought-provoking the assumptions that potentially controvert it. Or perhaps it assessment because an older generation get through journalists don’t quite realise evenhanded how absent feminism’s challenging pointer stereotypical gender roles has antique from the lives of excellence younger generation."^[19]

Germaine Greer's review so-called that some of the book's writing on sex contained "a level of ignorance that high opinion positively medieval".

However, the Vagenda pointed out that her snuff out contention that "the human mamma, like the bovine udder, option not squirt unless compressed" psychotherapy not backed up by examination evidence.^[20]

In a review in The Times,^[21] Helen Rumbelow wrote meander "they are pitched so rich at the internet generation Side-splitting think Germaine Greer wouldn’t unexcitable have the vocabulary to stockpile what they are on about".

She added: "It’s a paperback written as a gift assimilate a teenage girl in mediocre age that has long antique confusing It’s unfair of distressed to ask too much delineate The Vagenda – to weekend away the deeper causes of womanly insecurity, for instance, or able solve anything. They’re just tiring to be good mates give your approval to those who come after them, and make them laugh".

References

External links